La fageda

The main objectives of this study are: to establish an architectural sequence for the Ah Canual group of sites; to analyse the typological schemes used, the techniques of construction and the material evidence - lithics, shell, epigraphy, iconography, funerary remains - and to put this into context with other nearby sites, tracing trends and developments over time. Spanish text.

Este libro es un estudio sobre lo que implican las formas de capitalismo contemporáneo en el Perú para el patrimonio ecológico del país, en diálogo con la literatura sobre extractivismo en América Latina. Su singularidad e importancia radican en que se enfoca no solo en la relación entre agua y políticas públicas, sino también en el vínculo entre las formas de poder y la naturaleza. Aguas en disputa, editado por María Teresa Oré e Ismael Muñoz, nos dice mucho sobre las repercusiones del capitalismo extractivista y las formas de poder privado, tanto para quienes tienen acceso a...

Content: I. Revolution and Law: H.P. Glenn: Law, Revolution and Rights u M.A. Simon: Must a Revolution Preserve Rights? u C. Wellman: Locke's Right to Revolution Reexamined u W.E. Murnion: Aquinas on Revolution u Shing-I Liu: Menschenrecht, Widerstandsrecht u. Revolution u II. Human Rights and Democracy: A. Mineau: L'origine des droits de l'homme u H. Kochler: Menschenrechtskonformitat demokrat. Systeme u M. Scheinin: Legal Protection of Human Rights and Different Conceptions of Democracy u J.F. Doyle: Fulfilling Revolutionary Promises u N. Lopez-Calera: Naturaleza dialectica de los derechos...

You can confront a stupid individual or a group of stupid people identified as such, but when the way people live and the way they are governed are possessed by stupidity, it seems impossible to reverse the situation. So how do we fight something that drags us down? You can fight fascism, communism, and many «isms» but can you fight stupidity when it is systemic and you yourself are part of the problem and justify totally absurd things? To try to answer these questions, the author ironizes about the misinterpreted welfare state and a single thought that surrounds us more and more.